Instapundit notes the arrival of Michael Wilson’s documentary on Michael Moore, calling it “very good.”
We got our copy in the mail yesterday and watched it (I thought this was old news by now, with the release date being Nov. 1, but apparently the pre-ordered copies are just now getting out). While the film is good, and important, I feel a little disappointed with it overall — mostly because the internet and FahrenHYPE 911 took care of most of the fact-checking details on Moore’s films (see bowlingfortruth, for one).
What Wilson is able to do with this film, though, is show how easy it is to be like Moore, to become your enemy the instant you preach against him, and how a “documentary” can fall from grace with convienient, untruthful editing, or by going into the subject with the end in mind, rather than letting the facts change the story along the way.
Wilson’s film also caused me to think about Moore’s craft and realize that all the clever tricks and distortions in his films are deliberate, and that’s what makes Moore the scumbag that he is — not his politics or his ideas, but his willingness to lie to his audience, and even himself. All the crap in his movies — those aren’t just mistakes, or just ideas I don’t agree with — they are deliberate lies. So, does that mean Michael Moore hates America? The answer to that, Wilson says, you’ll have to decide for yourself.
This film does a good job at launching the subject and opening the lines of communication, trying to bridge the divide between right and left, and taking a look at just what a documentary is. It’s also got plenty of humor along the way — how could it not, with Penn Jillette as one of its main stars? It also features interviews with people who appeared in Moore’s films, Dinesh D’Souza, J.C. Watts, David Horowitz, Albert Maysles and others.
My favorite part — a deleted scene in the extras where Wilson interviews a group of soldiers back from Iraq. After watching this film, I am more hopeful about the direction this country is headed, about our ability to talk across the 50/50 divide, and about the prospect of leaving the bile of Michael Moore behind as we celebrate the arrival of a new year.
“Very good?” Well… on second thought, maybe it is. Maybe I’m just upset that it took nearly two months to arrive.
By the way, it got two thumbs up.
From the fishkite archives, here is a reminder of the Iraq that was, for those pundits like Bob Herbert and Andrew Greeley who consider the current Iraq a “debacle” and say what we’re doing there is “unnecessary, foolish, ill-conceived, badly executed and, finally, unwinnable:”
Then there were the events that were not unreported but that nonetheless still haunt me. A 31-year-old Kuwaiti woman, Asrar Qabandi, was captured by Iraqi secret police occupying her country in 1990 for “crimes,” one of which included speaking with CNN on the phone. They beat her daily for two months, forcing her father to watch. In January 1991, on the eve of the American-led offensive, they smashed her skull and tore her body apart limb by limb. A plastic bag containing her body parts was left on the doorstep of her family’s home.
The writer, CNN’s Easton Jordan, goes on to say this:
Now that Saddam Hussein’s regime is gone, I suspect we will hear many, many more gut-wrenching tales from Iraqis about the decades of torment. At last, these stories can be told freely.
Yes, they can now be told, but CNN isn’t doing the telling. Neither is the New York Times. The mainstream media is still keeping that news to themselves.
For the real story, we are forced to consult the “partisan political ideological forces” in the blogosphere - the “pajamahadeen,” the “digital brownshirts” and the “nation of ankle-biters.”
And we are better for it.
This book review by Evangelical Outpost’s Joe Carter might not interest anybody but me (just so you know). Carter uses the framework of the last good book I read, The Tipping Point (highly recommend), to introduce one of the next books I hope to read, Blog.
Thinking back on the past year, I’m amazed at how influenced my purchases (including Christmas gifts) have been by the Internet. Nearly every significant purchase I’ve made (book I’ve read, movie I’ve watched, etc) recently can be traced back to something I read online, researched online, heard online, or at least wrote about myself. That’s despite the fact that most of my purchases are still made the old-fashioned way.
I’m a little disappointed that Carter beat me to the punch on this one, because I also thought of the Blogosphere as a perfect illustration of The Tipping Point in effect, even though I think Malcolm Gladwell wrote the book a couple years before the Internet took off.
Which brings me to my next thought, that fishkite is never going to be like Instapundit, or some of the other blogs that pump out timely information during the day, when news is first reported. That job is reserved for people who can blog during the day, at work, or whatever. I think the perfect set-up is for this type of blogger to write from home, in his or her pajamas of course, about stuff that is happening, as it happens, a couple timezones downstream.
The second type of blogger is the one that labors and spins, eventually squeezing out a retrospective gem, and/or adding a shade of localization to the topic. This is the blogger that writes later, in detail, about things that happened in the local timezone, while everyone was at work. Or about things that happened days, weeks or months ago. My local hero in this category is Mike Hollihan of Half-bakered. His latest post is a masterpiece — well written, well researched, and, well, old news. But not old to me! And certainly not expired news, as it was Instalanched upon arrival (IUA).
Fishkite has existed in the neither-lands between these two categories, and will probably continue to live in that realm. That’s okay. Fishkite is happy with itself as is (although I’m looking for a new editor, if you know what I mean).
But if I had to pick, I’d wish that in this new year I could do half as much with my cable internet connection as Hollihan does with his dial-up.
My other wish for the new year is for both Half-Bakered and Rodent Regatta to come back, full steam.
And if I had three wishes — it would be for everybody else to join the blogosphere, too.
And if I had four wishes, this season, the fourth would of course be for all the children of the world to join hands and sing together in the spirit of harmony and peace.
And if I had five wishes… well, I think you know where this is going.
Last week there was a significant weather event, and people needed help.
It happened in Asia — a big tsunami wiped out thousands of people and displaced many others.
There was also another, lesser event, in parts of the United States, and it affected me directly.
Alison and I were driving from Memphis to Nashville on Wednesday afternoon to spend Christmas with her family. Around the time we left home, the sky fell out and covered the roads with sheets of sleet and ice. Our three-hour trip turned into 8 or 9… until it was abruptly halted around Bucksnort. Traveling at the blazing speed of 35 mph, our car decided to spin out of control, slide us backwards and just in front of the car beside us, and into a muddy, icy ditch, where we were stuck.
Thankfully, some folks driving through from Ft. Smith, AR, stopped to pick us up, in the middle of an ice storm, in the pitch black of night, not knowing who we were. They ended up driving us all the way into Nashville. For the hour or two it took us to drive those 40 miles, their vehicle was so packed that the mom had to sit uncomfortably on a cooler, with her adult daughter smashed up against her left side. Once in Nashville, they took us right to Alison’s dad, who was waiting for us at a gas station, and they asked for nothing in return.
Oh, and I forgot to mention, they’re stingy people. Let me explain…
Later on in the week, we went back to see if we could get our car out of the ditch, to no avail. So we just got our belongings and decided to return later and either pull it out with my father-in-law’s little truck, or call for a tow. So on Sunday we got to the car again, and the truck was able to pry it out of the hole, but we couldn’t get the car all the way up the incline.
For that job, we needed the 101st Airborne.
No, really. When a soldier with the 101st Airborne saw us, he stopped his huge 4-wheel-drive truck and gave us a hand. Eventually, he pulled me onto the shoulder, where I was able to drive our car away on my own. Without his help, it would have been much more difficult or expensive, or both, to fix the situation. The soldier asked us for nothing in return. We barely got his name.
And one more thing — he’s stingy.
Why do I say that? Only to illustrate how ridiculous and insulting were the comments of U.N. Emergency Relief Coordinator Jan Egeland yesterday.
I work for a non-profit organization. We need donations in order to do our work for the community. We are thankful for all our donors, big and small, whether they give their time, money, or anything else. We simply can’t keep our doors open without the kindness of private citizens — giving out of their own sense of love, because of their individual values, in whatever way they are blessed enough or talented enough or generous enough to give.
If we called our donors stingy, we would no longer be around. If we called our biggest donor stingy, we would be cut off for good and unable to keep doing our good work.
Let’s say our biggest donor was Office Depot (to my knowledge, it isn’t); what would happen if we said all the company’s customers wanted to pay higher prices, and so it is stingy of them to only donate 0.1 (or whatever) percent of their gross income to our organization? Wouldn’t we do better by asking Office Depot to launch a charity event where their customers could give money or donated items (new, used, both) for an auction benefitting our organization (and, in turn, the community we serve)? Instead, do we just complain that Office Depot doesn’t charge its customers enough?
And, on top of that, how could we have the gall to bite the hand that feeds us, the biggest hand that feeds us, if the top people in our organization were still in the middle of an investigation into a scam where they skimmed money from the charity, leaving the would-be beneficiaries with nothing (not to mention a dictator with millions to pour into WMD research?)
I think you see where I’m going with this. Here, then, is a brief roundup of this awful story. Thanks to this idiot, the story has nothing to do with suffering people in Asia. Instead, the story is about a quarrel between the world’s most corrupt institution and the world’s biggest benefactor.
Star Tribune
Powell said the United States “has given more aid in the last four years than any other nation or combination of nations in the world.”
The U.S. Agency for International Development spent $2.4 billion in the last year for emergency disaster relief.
Egeland responded to Powell’s criticism by saying that he had been misunderstood and that he had not been referring to aid for the quake and tsunami victims but to the overall trend in recent years by Western countries in aiding the poor. He said pledges for the current crisis had been “most generous.”I have been misinterpreted when I yesterday said that my belief that rich countries in general can be more generous,” Egeland added. “This has nothing to do with any particular country or the response to this emergency.”
Reuters 1:
Asked on Monday about the response of rich nations to crises like the tsunami, U.N. Emergency Relief Coordinator Jan Egeland said: “It is beyond me why are we so stingy, really.”
But he rowed back from the statements on Tuesday, telling reporters: “I’ve been misinterpreted when I yesterday said that I believed that rich countries in general can be more generous.”
“It has nothing to do with any particular country or the response to this emergency. We are in early days and the response has so far been overwhelmingly positive,” he said.
“The United States is not stingy,” Powell told CNN’s “American Morning” program.
Reuters 2:
Asked about the response of rich nations to such crises, he said: “It is beyond me why are we so stingy, really.”
“If actually the foreign assistance of many countries now is 0.1 or 0.2 percent of their gross national income, I think that is stingy really. I don’t think that is very generous,” he said.
“We are busting our butts to help and comments like that don’t reflect what we are doing,” said a State Department official, speaking on condition of anonymity.
The United Nations urged rich nations a quarter of a century ago to give away 0.7 percent of their gross domestic product every year in the form of development aid.
To date, however, just a handful of European nations, most of them in Scandinavia, actually meet that goal.
The United States, the world’s largest economy, earmarks 0.13 percent a year of its GDP to development aid. But that figure excludes aid to Iraq and Afghanistan as well as food aid, where the United States is the world’s largest donor.
Egeland said on Tuesday his remarks had been misinterpreted and praised the rapid international response to the crisis, singling out the United States and Europe for their generosity.
Countries have contributed or pledged nearly $100 million in the first few days after the disaster “and it is going up,” Egeland told CNN’s “Larry King Live” show. “It’s a massive, massive relief effort.”
But “it is sad that there has been a global decline in money available for foreign assistance and humanitarian assistance — and that happens in a growing world economy,” he added. “It’s my job to be impatient, I’ve seen too many starving children.”
The United States provided an initial $15 million mostly channeled through the International Federation of the Red Cross and Red Crescent, plus logistic support for aid efforts. On Tuesday, the U.S. Agency for International Development added $20 million for the earthquake relief, a White House spokesman said.
Cliff May:
AMERICA STINGY? It’s a lie. Americans are the most generous people on earth. But Americans prefer to give privately – through charities, NGOs, religious groups, corporate and private philanthropies and foundations.
We’d rather not pay higher taxes and trust some government official or UN bureaucrat to spend our donations properly. We especially should not want to trust UN bureaucrats – knowing what we now know about such programs as Oil for Food.
Hudson Institute:
At the upcoming World Summit on Sustainable Development in Johannesburg later this month, the U.S. will again be pilloried for being stingy on foreign aid. U.S. government aid as a percentage of GNP does indeed rank last. Denmark, Norway, the Netherlands, Luxembourg and Sweden are lauded for being on top.
But the figures, counting only public sector contributions, are deceptive. Americans help others abroad — just as they do domestically — primarily through private donations, foundations, corporate and university giving, religious offerings, and direct help to needy family members. Scandinavians and other Europeans give abroad primarily as they do at home — through government.
So, at the guilt-fest in Jo’burg, the U.S. delegation should tell the real story of American generosity abroad. While there are no complete figures for international private giving, conservative estimates from surveys and voluntary reporting are impressive: Americans privately give at least $34 billion overseas — more than three times U.S. official foreign aid of $10 billion.
Fishkite.com (May, 2004):
Is America really that stingy?
If Germany, the wealthiest European nation and the fifth wealthiest nation overall, gave 0.2 percent of its GDP in foreign aid, that would be $4.32 billion. In comparison, if the United States gives 0.1 percent of its GDP (actually $9.9 billion), that is $5.58 billion or 129 percent more dollars than Germany gives.
Even stopping there, the United States is the most generous country on Earth, but there are other elements to consider. According to USAID, the United States gives a total of $56.2 billion in aid (not just $9.9 billion), when you factor in other U.S. government assistance, private assistance, foundations, corporate giving, private volunteering, university donations and church funds.
If you add just our private donations, which make up 60% of America’s total foreign aid, to the amount the United States gives in development and other government assistance, the total is $52 billion or 1200 percent more dollars than Germany’s government contributes. Any way you compare the data, except for one, it is clear that Americans give substantially more aid to developing nations than any other country in the world. Of course, that exception is the one Bono and Suskind offer.
And now it’s the one Egeland offers.
Again, America is showing it’s true character, despite the ravings of this U.N. lunatic. Our government has more than doubled its pledge since this weekend, yes, but the private sphere is at work, as well.
Right now, a Christian radio station I listen to frequently is holding its bi-annual pledge drive, but it has in-turn pledged 10% of all listener year-ends gifts to Food for the Hungry, which is helping victims of the tsunami.
Can you believe that? Only 10%. What a bunch of cheapskates.
Andrew Greeley may be “a priest in good standing,” but he’s certainly confused.
Some conservative Catholics — Republicans, I assume — are spreading the word on the Internet that I am an “unfrocked” (sic) priest. That is false witness. I am and have been for 50 years a priest in good standing of the Archdiocese of Chicago. Call (312) 751-8220 if you don’t believe me. False witness is a grave sin and must be confessed before Christmas communion. Moreover, those who commit it are bound to restore the reputation of the one about whom they’ve lied.
Whoa there, Father… maybe you should ease up on the “false witness” charge, at least until you can sort out your own sins:
One reads in the papers that the Pentagon expects the war in Iraq to continue till 2010. Donald Rumsfeld will not guarantee that it will be over by 2009. How many dead and maimed Americans by then? How many sad obituaries? How many full pages in the papers with pictures of all the casualties?
Why?
The reasons change: weapons of mass destruction, war on terror, freedom and democracy for the people of Iraq, American credibility.
Actually, no, the reasons do not change. President Bush offered all of these reasons at one time, in one place, before U.S. forces took out Hussein. See for yourself.
All are deceptions. This cockamamie and criminally immoral war was planned before the Sept. 11 attack in which Iraq was not involved. It has nothing to do with the war on terror.
Wrong again.
American-style freedom and democracy in Arab countries are hallucinations by men and women like Paul Wolfowitz and Condi Rice whose contribution to the war is writing long memos — Republican intellectuals with pointy heads.
Is that how priests “in good standing” write these days — personal attacks on political leaders and pessimistic rants doubting the ability of a particular race to form a democracy and deal with freedom?
